The role of nutrition in Drosophila Metamorphosis

One of the most magical and inspiring spectacles of the natural world is metamorphosis. We have all heard the familiar story The Very Hungry Caterpillar, by Eric Carle, in which a homely caterpillar eats voraciously before mysteriously disappearing into a cocoon and miraculously emerging as an elegant butterfly.

In fact, all holometabolous insects undergo metamorphosis. Holometabolous insects are ones that have four distinct stages of development: embryo, larva, pupa, and adult. The most widely studied holometabolous insect is the fruit fly species Drosophila melangogaster. For our purposes, we will analyze Drosophila development as a representation of all holometabolous insects.

The four stages of the life cycle of holometabolous insects: embryo, larva, pupa, and adult.

So, how exactly is this phenomenon triggered?

It turns out, that hungry caterpillar was gorging himself for a reason!  Nutrition plays a key role.  In all holometabolous insects, a critical weight must be reached before metamorphosis can be initiated. Now, we pose the question:

How does an individual determine when they have reached critical weight?

A group of scientists from the University of Washington decided to test this very question, and published their results in an article titled “The Role of the Prothoracic Gland in Determining Critical Weight for Metamorphosis in Drosophila melangogaster,” by Christen Mirth, James W. Truman, and Lynn M. Riddiford.

In the article, two hormones are implicated in repressing the growth of larval and imaginal tissues: ecdysteroid (ecdysterone) and juvenile hormone, both regulated by the prothoracic gland.

The authors hypothesized that insulin-dependent growth of the prothoracic gland was part of a mechanism that assesses when critical weight has been achieved. To test their hypothesis, they screened for tissues that might be involved in size assessment. Specifically, they overexpressed PI3K or Dp110 to enlarge specific tissues relative to the larval body size. Conversely, they overexpressed PTEN to reduce their size. They predicted that if an organ were involved in size assessment, then enhancing its growth would produce small adults, whereas suppressing its growth would result in abnormally large adults.

Coordination of organism growth through insulin and ecdysone signaling. The prothoracic gland releases ecdysone that activates the ecdysone receptor in fat body cells, producing an unknown factor X. This factor may suppress growth by inhibiting the release of insulin-like peptides from insulin-producing cells. Insulin-like peptides activate the insulin receptor and PI3K signaling pathway, activating genes that inhibit growth.

To better understand the manipulations made, it is important to know a little about the Insulin signaling pathway in Drosophila. The best explanation I found about this topic was in a review written by the same authors called “Size assessment and growth control: how adult size is determined in insects.” by Christen K. Mirth and Lynn M. Riddiford. The Drosophila insulin receptor (InR) plays different roles in pre- and post- critical-weight larval growth. The InR cascade appears to be involved in regulating the development and is downstream of the size-assessment event occurring at critical weight. The Drosophila insulin-like peptides are the likely ligands for InR. InR in turn, activates the substrate which recruits Dp110 (PI3K) to the membrane via its adaptor protein p60. Dpp10 converts PIP2 to PIP3. The accumulation of PIP3 in the membrane results in increased cell growth. PTEN is a phosphatase that converts PIP3 to PIP2, thus suppressing cell growth. The balance between cellular levels of PIP3 and PIP2, regulated by Dp110 and PTEN, makes tissues larger or smaller.

Insulin signaling pathways involved in controlling nutrition-dependent growth in Drosophia

What they found was that changing the size of the prothoracic glands produced changes in size that suggested that they might be involved in size assessment.

Figure 3: A and C show prothoracic glands (PGs) of larva from control cultures, while B and D show larva with enlarged PGs.

Larvae with prothoracic glands that had been enlarged by overexpressing PI3K had remarkably reduced critical weight and metamorphosed to tiny adults.

Figure 3F: On the left: pupa formed from control culture. On the right: pupa formed from larva with enlarged PGs.

They concluded that the insulin-dependent growth of the prothoracic gland is involved in determining when critical weight has been reached. Furthermore, there is evidence that the signal involved in size assessment is ecdysteroid concentration. In larvae with enlarged glands, the individuals showed an increase in the transcription of two genes that encode enzymes involved in ecdysteroid synthesis: phantom and disembodied, and of the ecdysteroid -inducible gene E74B, indicating elevated ecdysteroid signaling.

In addition, larvae in which prothoracic gland growth was suppressed showed overgrowth phenotypes, but if they were fed food containing ecdysteroids, they metamorphosed at normal sizes. Most likely, ecdysteroid concentrations are important during size assessment.

Given the findings, the scientists proposed a model for size assessment in Drosophila:

The insulin pathway controls the growth of all tissues and can input directly on the size assessment system by controlling the growth of the prothoracic gland. Thus, the mechanism that controls adult size integrates both the pathways involved in controlling nutrition-dependent growth with those that regulate developmental transitions. Pre-critical weight, JH represses the secretion of prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH), which supresses ecdysteroid synthesis by the prothoracic glands. After reaching critical weight, JH synthesis is shut off, allowing PTTH release. PTTH induces ecdysteroid secretion, which initiates the cessation of feeding and the onset of metamorphosis.

This article had many strengths. I found it to be clear and well-organized. The images of the flies and the glands were clearly focused and easy to see. The data visualizations, tables, and graphs of the fly measurements were relatively easy to interpret as well. Furthermore, the experimental procedures were explicitly documented at the end of the article, including the recipes of the flies’ diets, how the growth was measured, and the protocol for the enzyme immunoassay performed.


Mirth, C., Truman, J.W. and Riddiford, L.M. (2005). The role of the prothoracic land in determining critical weight for metamporphosis in Drosophila melangogaster. Curr.Biol. 15, 1796-1807.

Mirth, C. and Riddiford, L.M. (2007). Size assessment and growth control: how adult size is determined in insects. BioEssays. 29, 344-354.

Image Citations:

Life Cycle of Drosophila melangogaster:

Insulin-Signaling Pathway pictures (second image and third image):

Drosophila pictures during development from the experiment:

1 Response to The role of nutrition in Drosophila Metamorphosis

  1. My spouse and i ended up being really relieved when Albert could finish off his investigation from the precious recommendations he came across through your web page. It’s not at all simplistic to simply choose to be freely giving information which usually some people could have been selling. And now we see we have got the writer to give thanks to for this. All of the illustrations you made, the simple blog navigation, the friendships your site give support to create – it’s most fantastic, and it’s really facilitating our son in addition to us know that the article is thrilling, which is exceedingly pressing. Thanks for the whole lot!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *